Agent Mesh Doctrine

AI Agents, Built Like Microservices.

Composable micro-agents with clear contracts, predictable behavior, and production-grade reliability.

Read the Agent Design Guide →

User Router Planner Extractor Writer Policy Validator Response

Monolithic agents are brittle.

One giant assistant blends intent, execution, policy, and formatting into a single prompt. That means opaque failures, unpredictable drift, and testing that feels like archaeology.

Hard to test

Behavior is tangled, so you cannot isolate a failure or add reliable fixtures.

Hard to govern

Permissions and tool usage bleed across every task with no boundaries.

Hard to scale

Each improvement risks regressions everywhere else.

Micro-agents with crisp contracts.

Stop building monolithic AI assistants. Build an agent mesh of small agents with crisp contracts. Each agent has a single responsibility, typed I/O, and explicit guardrails.

Composable workflows

Micro-agents chain together like microservices and can be orchestrated in parallel.

Replaceable components

Swap one agent without retraining the whole system or rewriting your prompts.

Observable behavior

Metrics by agent: latency, cost, success rate, and failure modes.

How it works

Request → Router → Agents → Tools → Result. Each hop is a typed contract with observability and policy checks.

Doctrine: micro-agents as services

Single responsibility

Less prompt bloat, less ambiguity.

Contracts

Inputs + outputs are typed and enforced.

Replaceability

Swap one agent without retraining the whole system.

Observability

Latency, cost, and success rate per agent.

Governance

Permissions per agent; finance cannot email.

Versioning

Agents are APIs; release v2 safely.

Fine-grain vs coarse-grain

Fine-grain micro-agents are strict, typed, and predictable. Coarse-grain agents plan and adapt. The best systems blend both.

AspectFine-grain micro-agentsCoarse-grain agents
ScopeSingle task, strict schemaMulti-step, flexible scope
Best forExtraction, validation, compliancePlanning, ambiguous requests
TradeoffMore orchestration complexityHarder to test and govern

Read the full breakdown →

Reference architecture

Request → Router → Agents → Tools → Result. The mesh stays small, typed, and observable.

Request Router Planner Micro-agents Extractor / Writer Policy / Validator Result

Example agent catalog

SummarizerAgent

Condenses long content into concise briefings.

ExtractorAgent

Produces structured output with strict schema.

ClassifierAgent

Routes intents with deterministic labels.

WriterAgent

Generates constrained tone and format.

ResearchAgent

Tool-gated research with safety checks.

PolicyAgent

Redacts sensitive data and enforces compliance.

Explore the full catalog →

FAQ

What is a micro-agent?

It is a small, single-purpose agent with explicit inputs, outputs, and guardrails.

How do micro-agents improve reliability?

Failures are isolated, retryable, and easy to observe.

When should I use coarse-grain agents?

Use them for planning and ambiguous tasks, then hand off to fine-grain agents for execution.

How do contracts work?

Each agent has typed input/output schemas, tool permissions, and eval rubrics.

Can I run micro-agents in parallel?

Yes. Fan-out and join patterns are built-in to the mesh design.

Is this approach production-ready?

Yes, because it mirrors proven microservice discipline with observability and governance.